... in the hours after the death of the first U.S. ambassador killed in decades, Mitt Romney -- panicked as his poll numbers have slipped -- punched hard against the president, unleashing an unwise, inaccurate and unpresidential attack on the Obama administration.
At the October 16, 2012 Presidential Debate, Republican challenger Willard Mitt Romney asserted that it took the Obama administration two weeks to refer to the September 11, 2012 attack on the American Ambassador in Libya as an act of terror. Incumbent President Barack Obama took strong exception to the Republican candidate's allegation and responded as you may view and hear in the following video.
Presidential debate moderator Candy Crowley fact checked Mitt Romney after the Republican presidential candidate charged that President Obama failed to call the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi an "act of terror."
ref: Candy Crowley Fact Checks Mitt Romney On Libya (VIDEO)
Willard Mitt Romney was and is less than truthful, less than honest, less than a true American, and far less than Presidential.
2 comments:
It doesn't really matter who said what when. Obama skipped two weeks of NSC daily briefings leading up to the murders, and his administration ignored the pleading of the on-site security chief that they needed help. My opinion, Obama didn't want to do anything during the weeks before because he's all about the spin and beefing up security= we helped our enemies take over Libya. That attention to spin led to the ambassador's death. I don't give two figs, how he put it, he was criminally negligent of his job as commander in chief, and now several good Americans are dead because of it. If he were a republican this would make him a worm in my book.
offensive, perhaps, but this was clearly a planned political attack on Romney which Obama carried out pretty well.
truth be told, Obama's inaction is more offensive
Post a Comment