Trolling Not Allowed

Trolling Not Allowed! Comments from anonymous trolls are not permitted and are deleted if posted by the offending pest.

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Covid-19 Anti-Vaxxers are Inconsiderate and Deplorable!

This Roland Hansen Commentary blog entry is a copy and paste of a posting made elsewhere on the internet by someone I know. In that I do not have permission, I cannot provide attribution. 

Here it is:


WHY THE SCHADENFREUDE?


You’ve likely seen it. I’ve posted “KARMA” headlined content mocking those who publicly and vigorously spread lies about vaccines and/or politicized COVID restrictions as some unAmerican “assault on freedom”… and then became infected by COVID and died.


Some say that’s cruel.


I say it’s necessary. 


Because walking around unvaccinated and unrestricted in the throes of a consequential, spreading, and raging pandemic IS NO DIFFERENT THAN DRUNK DRIVING because yes, you might die by your inexcusable behavior, but worse, YOU MIGHT TAKE INNOCENT PEOPLE WITH YOU to the grave.


And there’s the rub. 


There’s the difference.


That’s why I mock.


That’s why I suggest they got what they deserved.


Because, unlike risky choices that only endanger the chooser - like BASE jumping, skydiving, mountain climbing, hang gliding, or tightrope walking, we have the unvaccinated potentially catching and spreading a fatal disease to others, including their own family and anyone they can convince to join them. 


Eschewing vaccines and then mingling among us isn’t different than driving impaired by drinks or drugs. 


Your “freedoms” END when you ENDANGER OTHERS!


And now TWO YEARS INTO THIS, those who ignore the science CANNOT claim they didn’t know better. And let’s remember, I only point out the passing of those who PUBLICLY and PROUDLY spread LIES about vaccines, masks, and distancing. I only target those who HEARD and SAW THE FACTS AND DATA and STILL

SELFISHLY BEHAVED WITH COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THE CONSEQUENCES to either themselves or OTHERS.


I bother to point out who they are because there’s a chance those who are doing the same thing might WAKE UP and STOP BEING THE REASON WE CAN’T END THIS NIGHTMARE.


They’re not “victims”. They’re PERPETRATORS and they must be called out. 


Even after they’re gone.


In fact… ESPECIALLY after they’re gone.

Friday, December 3, 2021

A Day in the Life of Sue Republican

The following is a' Copy and Paste' from a Facebook Posting to which I was referred by a friend:


A day in the Life of Sue Republican 


Sue gets up at 6 a.m. and fills her coffeepot with water to prepare her morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards.


With her first swallow of coffee, she takes her daily medication. Her medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to insure their safety and that they work as advertised. 


All but $10 of her medications are paid for by her employer's medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Sue gets it too. 


She prepares her morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Sue's bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry. 


In the shower, Sue reaches for her shampoo. Her bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for her right to know what she was putting on her body and how much it contained. 


Sue dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air she breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air. 


She walks to the subway station for her government-subsidized ride to work. It saves her considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor. 


Sue begins her work day. She has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Sue's employer pays these standards because Sue's employer doesn't want his employees to call the union. 


If Sue is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, she'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn't think she should lose her home because of her temporary misfortune. 


Its noon and Sue needs to make a bank deposit so she can pay some bills. Sue's deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Sue's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression. 


Sue has to pay her Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and her below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Sue and the government would be better off if she was educated and earned more money over her lifetime. 


Sue is home from work. She plans to visit her father this evening at his farm home in the country. She gets in her car for the drive. Her car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards. 


She arrives at her childhood home. Her generation was the third to live in the house financed by Farmers' Home Administration because bankers didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded rural electrification. 


She is happy to see her father, who is now retired. Her father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Sue wouldn't have to. 


Sue gets back in her car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn't mention that Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Sue enjoys throughout her day. Sue agrees: "We don't need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I'm self-made and believe everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have".

~ Kathy Joe North


Saturday, September 4, 2021

ProChoice IS NOT ProAbortion. WORDS MATTER!!!

When it concerns pregnancy and whether to carry to full term or to terminate pregnancy, I believe it is the pregnannt woman's right to choose, not your right, nor my right. There are some people who allege that being pro-choice is the same as pro-abortion; I respectfully disagree with that interpretation. The anti pro-choice people put their own spin on the subject to make it seem that those of us who believe in a woman's right to choose what to do with her own body during pregnancy are ogres who believe in murdering babies --- that is a total untruth!!!  

Please read the following "copy and paste' of what I read on Facebook; it fairly well captures my thoughts on this sensitive and polaring topic.

I'm not pro-abortion... I'm pro-Beatrice who found out at her 20 week anatomy scan that the infant she had been so excited to bring into this world had developed without life sustaining organs.
 
I'm pro-Sable who was sexually assaulted on her way home from work, only to come to the horrific realization that her assailant planted his seed in her when she got a positive pregnancy test result a month later. 

I'm pro-Thea who hemorrhaged due to a placental abruption, causing her parents, spouse, and children to have to make the impossible decision on whether to save her or her unborn child. 

I'm pro-little Cathy who had her innocence ripped away from her by someone she should have been able to trust and her 11 year old body isn't mature enough to bear the consequence of that betrayal. 

I'm pro-Melissa who's working two jobs just to make ends meet and has to choose between bringing another child into poverty or feeding the children she already has because her spouse walked out on her. (Maybe one of those is a minimum wage job at Hobby Lobby, and she can't afford birth control because her employer went to the Supreme Court to make sure her insurance plan doesn't cover it.)

I'm pro-Beverly who realizes that she is in no way financially, emotionally, or physically able to raise a child. 

I'm pro-Maxine who went through IVF, ending up with SIX viable implanted eggs requiring selective reduction in order to ensure the safety of her and a SAFE amount of fetuses. 

I'm pro-Jessica who is FINALLY getting the strength to get away from her physically abusive spouse only to find out that she is carrying the monster's child. 

I'm pro-Vera who went into her confirmation appointment after YEARS of trying to conceive only to hear silence where there should be a heartbeat. 

I'm pro-Layla who lost her virginity in her sophomore year with a broken condom and now has to choose whether to be a teenage mom or just a teenager. 

I'm pro-CeeCee who just found out she's already 13 weeks along, but the egg never made it out of her fallopian tube so either she terminates the pregnancy or risks dying from internal bleeding. 

You can say I'm pro-choice but the truth is I'm pro-life. Their lives. Women's lives.
You don't get to pick and choose which scenarios should be accepted. 

It's not about which stories you don't agree with. It's about fighting for the women in the stories that you do agree with and the CHOICE that was made. 

Women's rights are meant to protect ALL women, regardless of their situation or how big their bank account is. Because, let's face it, girls & women with money  (yes, even those who may have voted for this bill) will always be able to find safe abortions just as they did before Roe v Wade. Most poor women will still get abortions too, whether from centuries old, unsafe, home methods or from opportunistic untrained people.

Roe v. Wade didn't create abortion. It ended desperate women dying from them.

ref: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10223473702184384&id=1643220237

ProChoice IS NOT ProAbortion. Words matter, people! 

Thursday, June 24, 2021

A Threat from Troy Neff of Toledo, Ohio

It was on June 24, 2021 at 8:40 a.m. that Troy Neff made a threat to me in his comment on my Roland's Ramblings blog entry entitled  Regarding Troy Neff of Toledo, Ohio in response to me posting this link to his public post that he made about me on his Facebook wall that I had placed on that blog entry as a response to another comment made previously by Troy. 

Here is a copy and paste of the comment that Troy Neff made in which he, himself wrote "I promise I won’t be nice. I’ll give you all the attention you don’t want. That’s a threat.":

Roland, dude, just fucking stop. What the fuck is your purpose??

I actually looked and read some of your recent posts. Looks like I’m the only one who did, by the way.

You’re depressed based on your own words. Stop worrying about the speck in my eye and work on the log in yours.

I honestly hope you get help. Attacking me because you’re unhappy and your kids can’t stand you is ridiculous. I’m old. You’re even older. Grow the fuck up.

If you post one more time? I promise I won’t be nice. I’ll give you all the attention you don’t want. That’s a threat. Not a physical threat but a threat. You want me to be a bully? Be careful what you wish for. What I say will hurt. It will hurt because it will be the truth. And you haven’t been honest with yourself. It’s pretty obvious.

Knock it off.


Saturday, May 15, 2021

The MidEast Conflict. Palestine. Israel.

Read the entire Facebook message thread to which I link in order to obtain further information that will widen your base of knowledge concerning the Palestine/Israel situation.

GET REAL ABOUT ISRAEL, Michael John Young, 14 May 2021.

Thursday, May 6, 2021

Estrangement in American Families is Not Uncommon!

The American family of today is not the same as it was a generation and more ago. The intimacy and closeness of families in the United States of America that was once the norm is now a thing of the past. All too often, adult children in America are tossing their parents aside, abandoning them, foresaking them, and disowning them. Estrangements within families are becoming a societal epidemic, in my opinion.

My wife and I have both been the object of alienation from adult children. We wed in December of 1995 and have a blended family. My wife has two children from her previous marrige; and, I have three children from my previous marriage. At the time we wed, my wife's son was 27 years of age and was married with one child, and her daughter was 25, married and had one child; none of my children were married, my oldest son was 22, my younger son was 21, and my daughter was 18. At the beginning, we all got along, although our respective children never really became close. 

As the years went by, things changed. My wife's son and his wife eventually had a total of 5 children; my wife's daughter and her husband eventually had another child and they have two children. My younger son married at age 25 and he and his wife have two children, and my daughter wed at age 34 and she and her husband have two children. 

It was around 2010 that I was informed that my wife's son forbade me from entering his house and and seeing his children (To this day, no one has told me why I was shut out!). Meanwhile, my wife's son continued to speak with his mother for approximately the next ten years, and allowed her to visit him and his children UNTIL he finally tossed her aside and stopped speaking with her around late 2019 / early 2020. My wife's daughter cast me aside for the second time in three years and stopped speaking with me altogether sometime around 2014; and, she totally disrespected her mother (my wife) abandoning her in 2016 by means of sending a series of nasty, abusive text messages. 

For about the past year-and-one-half now, my married son has not answered the phone when I have telephoned (thank you caller ID), has not returned my messages left on his telephone answering system, has not responded to any of my numerous electronic messages (e-mails, etc.), and has not responded to any of my written correspondence sent via United States Postal Service. 

That of which I have written about my own family is only part of the family dysfunction that exists. More estrangement exists with siblings, nephews, nieces, and cousins. We have a very large extended family. Undoubtedly, this blog entry will only make some family members become (more) upset with me. However, I have reached out so many, many times to the various family members who have so easily and consciously chosen to throw my wife and I aside, only to be ignored, that I have decided it is finally time I accept the fact that we are dead to them and to get on with what is left of our lives. What a terrible shame that we, a 73 year-old man and 72 year-old woman, must finish our lives like this! 

It has been relayed to me that I make public that which should remain private. It has been said that I embarass family members by what I say or write. I say I am who I am. I say people should be accountable and responsible for their own words and actions. I say no one other than me should be judged for my words and my actions. If what I say or write about someone else is true but it embaraases them, then they need to look within themselves, not blame me for what they have said and done. If I am to remain estranged from some of my family, and should I die tonight, at least maybe this Roland Hansen Commentary blog entry might open some eyes and cause people to introspect and to think about their value system as it relates to family interpersonal relationships.

I have recently read a very interesting article which profers that American values are fueling estrangement. The article concludes with:

Yet in less grave scenarios our American love affair with the needs and rights of the individual conceals how much sorrow we create for those we leave behind. We may see cutting off family members as courageous rather than avoidant or selfish. We can convince ourselves that it’s better to go it alone than to do the work it takes to resolve conflict. Some problems may be irresolvable, but there are also relationships that don’t need to be lost forever.

It is sometimes tempting to see family members as one more burden in an already demanding life. It can be hard to see their awkward attempts to care for us, the confounding nature of their struggles, and the history they carry stumbling into the present. It can be difficult to apologize to those we’ve hurt and hard to forgive those who have hurt us. But sometimes the benefits outweigh the costs. Tara Westover wrote in her memoir, Educated, “I know only this: that when my mother told me she had not been the mother to me that she wished she’d been, she became that mother for the first time.”

We are all flawed. We should have that at the forefront of our minds when deciding who to keep in or out of our lives—and how to respond to those who no longer want us in theirs.

I encourage you to read the entire article. To do so, just follow the embedded ink contained within its title.

ref: Coleman, Joshua, A Shift in American Family Values Is Fueling Estrangement, The Atlantic, January 10, 2021.

Unfortunately, estrangement in American families is not uncommon!

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

The U.S.A. Today - Immigrants No Longer Wanted

The United States of America was once known as the Nation of Immigrants. 

That all changed under the Administration of Donald John Trump. (Follow the immediately preceding embedded link to get the facts contained within each of the article's own embedded links.)


Monday, February 15, 2021

The United States of America Needs To Have A Constitutional Convention!

The present Constitution of the United States of America has served its purpose. However, it is now time for the United States to adopt a new constitution. Therefore, a constitutional convention should be called in order to write an entirely new constitution for the United States of America.

In the past, I have asserted that it is time to repeal the Second Amendment. The purpose of the Second Amendment as envisioned by The Founders has been served and is no longer needed in the USA.

And now, the failure of the United States Senate to convict Donald John Trump on the charge of inciting insurrection strongly indicates the United States Senate is an outmoded archaic institution.

The United States of America is a republic; it is a representative democracy, a democratic republic. The national legislature in the United States is bicameral, consisting of two chambers, the House of Representatives and the Senate. These two legislative chambers are jointly referred to as Congress. Throughout the history of the United States of America, the size of Congress has increased as the number of states have increased and as the population has increased. Today, Congress consists of 100 senators (two from each state) and 435 voting members of the House of Representatives.

To balance the interests of states having small populations with states having large populations back in the 18th Century, the Framers of the Constitution divided the power of Congress between the two chambers, a.k.a. houses. Each state, regardless of the size of its population, has 2 representatives (known as Senators) in the Senate, while representation for each state in the House of Representatives is based on the size of each state's population, i.e. proportionate representation. There can be no fewer than one Representative per state, and no more than one for every 30,000 persons. The Apportionment Act of 1941, in addition to specifying the apportionment method, sets the House size at 435, requires an apportionment every 10 years, and mandates administrative procedures for apportionment.

Over time, the House of Representatives and the Senate have evolved into very different bodies. They have entirely separate rules and ways of conducting business. 

The United States Constitution gives Congress the authority to impeach and remove the President, Vice President, and all federal civil officers for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. The practice of impeachment makes clear, however, that Members of Congress are not civil officers subject to impeachment and removal. 

The two houses of Congress have two very different roles in the impeachment process. In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives acts much in the same way as would a grand jury that evaluates whether there is enough reasonable evidence to indict, i.e. bring charges against, a person, and if there is, then the grand jury decides if there is probable cause and recommends charges. In the impeachment process, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment. A committee of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate. The Senate acting as would a trial jury sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which Senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. The U.S. Constitution requires more than a simple majority to convict; indeed, the Constitution requires a supermajority of a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. 

In the historical second impeachment trial of Donald John Trump, there were 57 Senators who voted Trump guilty on the charge of inciting insurrection for his role in the January 6, 2021 United States Capitol riot that left 5 people dead, including a police officer. The guilty vote included 7 Republican Senators in the most bipartisan majority to support an impeachment conviction in the history of the United States of America. Only 43 Senators, all of them Trump Loyalist Republicans, voted not guilty.

The indisputable fact is that Trump was found guilty on the charge of inciting insurrection by a majority bipartisan vote of 57 Senators in the United States Senate, but was aquitted by a minority vote consisting of 43 deplorable Trumplicans in the United States Senate.

The 57 senators who voted to convict Trump represent 76.7 million more Americans than 43 Trumplican Senators who voted to let him off scot-free!

Underscoring today's unrepresentative of population and thus undemocratic United States Senate:

  • Each of the 50 States, regardless of its population, is allotted and elects two (2) Senators.
  • Presently, the United States Senate is evenly split with 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans. However, the Democrat Senators represent 41 million more people than do the Republican Senators.
  • Fifteen (15) states with a total population of 38 million people are allotted 30 Senators and have elected a total of 30 Republicans. Meanwhile, California with a total population of 40 million people (2 million more people than the total population of those 15 states combined), is allotted 2 Senators (28 less Senators than the combined total for those15 states) and has elected 2 Democrats.

With this latest faux pas, the U.S. Senate has yet again demonstrated that it continues to act against the best interests of modern day United States of America. The Senate has proven again that it does not represent the wishes of the majority of Americans. 

The United States Senate is the antithesis of representative democracy. The United States of America needs to change the structure of its government with the elimination of the Senate, in order to do so, The United States of America Needs To Have A Constitutional Convention!


Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Fascist Trump Insurrection Supporters

Yesterday, 9 February 2021, in regards to the Second Impeachment of Treasonous Megalomaniac Fascist Donald J. Trump, I posted the following on my Facebook wall:

As stated by Representative Marcy Kaptur, "As the Trump Impeachment trial begins, I ask that every American watch this video. It retells the events of January 6th as they unfolded – a story of a mob incited by their leader to stage an insurrection against democracy and overturn a lawful election. It was a tragic day for our republic, resulting in the death of 7 Americans and injuries to dozens of law enforcement officers."

Attached to that posting was a link to the Washington Post video "Impeachment managers display first video evidence at Trump trial" that was part of the proceedings.

To that post, one person in paeticular made the following comments:

What about when the democrats incited the major looting and destruction of our country over the summer, thats ok.

The 6th was staged , most were blm and antifa. 

Democrats are on video everywhere telling them not to stop.

How many people were killed during your so called protest(riots). I mean even officers were killed.

And NO arrests,  imagine that.

Its called double standards. 

So sick of hearing about this and nothing been done about the shit that happen over the summer, and its STILL happening in places,  but do we hear about that, NO.

Just my opinion

OMG! That typical realty-denying Fascist commentary reads to me like something right out of the QAnon playbook! 

Read: 


Fascist Trump Insurrection Supporters are mindless automatons who lack the ability to think logically, and only believe that which reinforces their own biased, illogical preconceived notions. Objective, verifiable facts mean nothing to them!